All fieldwork should be planned and conducted in a way that is ethical, responsible and safe, for students, staff, visited communities and all other stakeholders. Programmes are expected to follow good practice in terms of health and safety and ethical reviews as codified in University Safety and Health Association (USHA) guidance (below). Codes of conduct should be in place for all those who undertake taught fieldwork - staff and students - that make explicit responsibilities.
The following list of online resources is dynamic. If you know of other relevant resources you think we should be sharing, we’d be happy to hear from you at rhed@rgs.org. The Society does not accept responsibility for the content of the external sites. Inclusion on this list does not equate to an endorsement of any content or organisation. Please contact the external site for questions regarding individual resources.
Health and Safety
Higher education sector guidance on Health and Safety in fieldwork and travel
Universities Safety and Health Association (UK)
Including all offsite visits and travel in the UK and overseas
Access resource
An inclusive risk assessment tool for travel and fieldwork
EGU General Assembly
Risk assessment forms and suggested approaches to considering hazards and appropriate mitigations that particularly affect protected characteristics.
Access resource
USHA guidance - full list
Universities Safety and Health Association (UK)
A list of all available USHA guidance documents.
Access resource
British Standard for adventurous activities outside the United Kingdom (BS 8848:2014)
British Standards Institution (UK)
Access resource
Fieldwork safety checklist
Queen Mary, University of London (UK)
A sample departmental safety checklist.
Access resource
Foreign travel advice
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (UK)
Current UK Government travel advice for 226 countries and territories.
Access resource
What is ‘safe’ in research fieldwork?
Wonkhe (UK)
Elizabeth Adams explores issues around traning and support for field researchers.
Access resource
Codes of conduct
Six fieldwork expectations
Sara Perry (UK)
Blog discussing and constructing a fieldwork code of conduct for undergraduate archaeologists.
Access resource
Fieldwork expectations agreement
Jennifer McKinnon, East Carolina University (USA)
Code of conduct from the program in Maritime Studies, East Carolina University.
Access resource
Fieldwork code of practice for staff and students
Northumbria University (UK)
Institutional example of a fieldwork code of conduct.
Access resource
Biosecurity
Better biosecurity: slowing the spread of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS)
University of Leeds (UK)
Short course to promote understanding of what biosecurity risks are, why they are important and how they can be reduced. On completion, participants receive a certificate that may be included in fieldwork or other risk assessments.
Access resource
UCL biosecurity notes
University College London (UK)
Department of Geography notes on the spread of invasive and non-native species.
Access resource
Great Britain Invasive Non-Native Species Strategy
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affaris (UK)
Key aims and actions to deliver a co-ordinated approach for addressing the threats posed by non-native species
Access resource
Fieldwork ethics
Research ethics
Economic and Social Research Council (UK)
ESRC framework for research ethics.
Access resource
Fieldwork ethics forum
Luis A. Vivanco (USA)
From 'Field Notes: A Guided Journal for Doing Anthropology'
Access resource
Selected readings
-
Bashir, N. (2018) Doing research in peoples’ homes: fieldwork, ethics and safety – on the practical challenges of researching and representing life on the margins, Qualitative Research, 18(6):pp. 638-653. DOI:10.1177/1468794117731808
-
Butler, R. (2008) Teaching geoscience through fieldwork. GEES Learning and Teaching Guide. ISBN 1-84102-1458-8
-
Daniels, L.D. and Lavallee, S. (2014) Better Safe than Sorry: Planning for Safe and Successful Fieldwork. The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 95: 264-273. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9623-95.3.264
-
Higgitt, D. and Bullard, J. (1999) Assessing Fieldwork Risk for Undergraduate Projects, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 23:3, pp. 441-449, DOI: 10.1080/03098269985407
-
Kovats‐Bernat, J.C. (2002) Negotiating Dangerous Fields: Pragmatic Strategies for Fieldwork amid Violence and Terror. American Anthropologist, 104: 208-222. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2002.104.1.208
-
Nash, D.J. (2000) Doing Independent Overseas Fieldwork 1: Practicalities and pitfalls, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 24:1, pp. 139-149, DOI: 10.1080/03098260085234
-
Sluka, J.A. (2020) Too dangerous for fieldwork? The challenge of institutional risk-management in primary research on conflict, violence and ‘Terrorism’, Contemporary Social Science, 15:2, pp. 241-257, DOI: 10.1080/21582041.2018.1498534